Social security privatization with elastic labor supply and
Social security privatization with elastic labor supply and second-best taxes
Rate this book:
About This Book
"This paper shows that many common methods of privatizing social security fail to reduce labor market distortions when taxes are second best, challenging a key reason to privatize. Ironically, providing "transition relief" to workers alive at the time of the reform, in an effort to protect their previous contributions, undercuts potential efficiency gains. Chile's reform -- the first major privatization that also served as a model for other countries -- actually increased labor market distortions. It is then shown that privatization with limited transition relief can reduce labor market distortions and produce gains to current and future generations without hurting initial retirees, i.e., a Pareto gain, even with second-best taxes"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Kent A. Smetters
Can the standard growth model
Can the standard growth model explain the post-war decline in the savings rate?
Controlling the cost of minimu
Controlling the cost of minimum benefit guarantees in public pension conversions
Insuring against terrorism
Insuring against terrorism
Investing the social security
Investing the social security trust fund in equities
Is the social security trust f
Is the social security trust fund worth anything?
Privatization versus prefundin
Privatization versus prefunding social security in a stochastic economy