Do markets respond to quality information?
Do markets respond to quality information?
Rate this book:
About This Book
"Although policymakers have increasingly turned to provider report cards as a tool to improve health care quality, existing studies provide mixed evidence that they influence consumer choices. We examine the effects of providing consumers with quality information in the context of fertility clinics providing Assisted Reproductive Therapies (ART). We report three main findings. First, clinics with higher birthrates had larger market shares after relative to before the adoption of report cards. Second, clinics with a disproportionate share of young, relatively easy-to-treat patients had lower market shares after adoption versus before. This suggests that consumers take into account information on patient mix when evaluating clinic outcomes. Third, report cards had larger effects on consumers and clinics from states with ART insurance coverage mandates. We conclude that quality report cards have potential to influence provider behavior in this setting"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by M. Kate Bundorf
Consumer demand for health inf
Consumer demand for health information on the internet
Consumer-oriented strategies f
Consumer-oriented strategies for improving health benefit design
Health risk, income, and the p
Health risk, income, and the purchase of private health insurance
Is health insurance affordable
Is health insurance affordable for the uninsured?
Mandated health insurance bene
Mandated health insurance benefits and the utilization and outcomes of infertility treatments
Pricing and welfare in health
Pricing and welfare in health plan choice