Inequality at work
Rate this book:
About This Book
"Economists have long speculated that individuals care about both their absolute income and their income relative to others. We use a simple theoretical framework and a randomized manipulation of access to information on peers' wages to provide new evidence on the effects of relative pay on individual utility. A randomly chosen subset of employees of the University of California was informed about a new website listing the pay of all University employees. All employees were then surveyed about their job satisfaction and job search intentions. Our information treatment doubles the fraction of employees using the website, with the vast majority of new users accessing data on the pay of colleagues in their own department. We find an asymmetric response to the information treatment: workers with salaries below the median for their pay unit and occupation report lower pay and job satisfaction, while those earning above the median report no higher satisfaction. Likewise, below-median earners report a significant increase in the likelihood of looking for a new job, while above-median earners are unaffected. Our findings indicate that utility depends directly on relative pay comparisons, and that this relationship is non-linear"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by David E. Card
Adapting to circumstances
Adapting to circumstances
An empirical model of wage ind
An empirical model of wage indexation provisions in union contracts
An evaluation of recent eviden
An evaluation of recent evidence on the employment effects of minimum and subminimum wages
Bargaining power, strike durat
Bargaining power, strike duration, and wage outcomes
Bargaining power, strike durat
Bargaining power, strike durations, and wage outcomes
Can compulsory military servic
Can compulsory military service increase civilian wages?