Are country reputations for good and bad leadership on AIDS
Are country reputations for good and bad leadership on AIDS deserved?
6 min read
Rate this book:
About This Book
"Some countries, like Brazil, have good reputations on AIDS policy, whereas others, notably South Africa, have been criticized for inadequate leadership. Cross-country regression analysis suggests that most of the 'poster children' for AIDS leadership have indeed performed better or worse than expected given their economic and institutional constraints and the demographic and health challenges facing them. Regressions are run on HAART coverage (number on highly active antiretroviral therapy as % of total need) and MTCTP coverage (pregnant HIV+ women accessing mother-to-child-transmission prevention services at % of total need). Brazil, Burkina-Faso, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Mali, Namibia, Suriname, Thailand, Paraguay, and Uganda performed consistently better than expected. South Africa, Uruguay, and Trinidad and Tobago performed consistently and significantly worse than expected"--P. 1.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Nicoli Nattrass
Cultural obstacles to the roll
Cultural obstacles to the rollout of antiretrovirals
Economics and the backlash aga
Economics and the backlash against AIDS-specific funding
Government leadership and ARV
Government leadership and ARV provision in developing countries
Inclusive Dualism
Inclusive Dualism
Macroeconomics Simplified
Macroeconomics Simplified
Modelling the relationship bet
Modelling the relationship between antiretroviral treatment and HIV prevention