Direct democracy and local public goods
Direct democracy and local public goods
Rate this book:
About This Book
"This paper presents an experiment where 48 Indonesian villages were randomly assigned to choose development projects through either representative-based meetings or direct election-based plebiscites. Plebiscites resulted in dramatically higher satisfaction among villagers, increased knowledge about the project, greater perceived benefits, and higher reported willingness to contribute. Changing the political mechanism had much smaller effects on the actual projects selected, with some evidence that plebiscites resulted in projects chosen by women being located in poorer areas. The results show that direct participation in political decision making can substantially increase satisfaction and legitimacy, even when it has little effect on actual decisions"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Benjamin A. Olken
Corruption perceptions vs. cor
Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality
Do television and radio destro
Do television and radio destroy social capital?
Final impact evaluation report
Final impact evaluation report
Indonesia's PNPM Generasi prog
Indonesia's PNPM Generasi program
Interim impact evaluation repo
Interim impact evaluation report
Monitoring corruption
Monitoring corruption