Openness, technology capital, and development
Openness, technology capital, and development
6 min read
Rate this book:
About This Book
A framework is developed with what we call technology capital. A country is a measure of locations. Absent policy constraints, a firm owning a unit of technology capital can produce the composite output good using the unit of technology capital at as many locations as it chooses. But it can operate only one operation at a given location, so the number of locations is what constrains the number of units it operates using this unit of technology capital. If it has two units of technology capital, it can operate twice as many operations at every location. In this paper, aggregation is carried out and the aggregate production functions for the countries are derived. Our framework interacts well with the national accounts in the same way as does the neoclassical growth model. It also interacts well with the international accounts. There are constant returns to scale, and therefore no monopoly rents. Yet there are gains to being economically integrated. In the framework, a country's openness is measured by the effect of its policies on the productivity of foreign operations. Our analysis indicates that there are large gains to this openness.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Ellen R. McGrattan
Average debt and equity return
Average debt and equity returns
Capital taxation during the U.
Capital taxation during the U.S. Great Depression
Comment on Gali and Rabanal's
Comment on Gali and Rabanal's "technology shocks and aggregate fluctuations; how well does the RBC model fit postwar U.S. data?"
Comment on Mendoza and Tesar's
Comment on Mendoza and Tesar's "why hasn't tax competition triggered a race to the bottom? Some quantitative lessons from the EU"
Does neoclassical theory accou
Does neoclassical theory account for the effects of big fiscal shocks?
Is the stock market overvalued
Is the stock market overvalued?