Comparing price and non-price approaches to urban water cons
Comparing price and non-price approaches to urban water conservation
6 min read
Rate this book:
About This Book
"Urban water conservation is typically achieved through prescriptive regulations, including the rationing of water for particular uses and requirements for the installation of particular technologies. A significant shift has occurred in pollution control regulations toward market-based policies in recent decades. We offer an analysis of the relative merits of market-based and prescriptive approaches to water conservation, where prices have rarely been used to allocate scarce supplies. The analysis emphasizes the emerging theoretical and empirical evidence that using prices to manage water demand is more cost-effective than implementing non-price conservation programs, similar to results for pollution control in earlier decades. Price-based approaches also have advantages in terms of monitoring and enforcement. In terms of predictability and equity, neither policy instrument has an inherent advantage over the other. As in any policy context, political considerations are important"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Sheila M. Olmstead
An international architecture
An international architecture for the post-Kyoto era
Do consumers react to the shap
Do consumers react to the shape of supply?
Markets and the Environment, S
Markets and the Environment, Second Edition
Wastewater and shale formation
Wastewater and shale formation development
Water demand under alternative
Water demand under alternative price structures