Will job testing harm minority workers?
Rate this book:
About This Book
"Because minorities typically fare poorly on standardized tests, job testing is thought to pose an equity-efficiency trade-off: testing improves selection but reduces minority hiring. We evaluate this trade-off using data from a national retail firm whose 1,363 stores switched from informal to test-based worker screening. We find that testing yielded more productive hires -- raising median tenure by 10 percent and reducing the frequency of firing for cause. Consistent with prior research, minorities performed significantly worse on the test. Yet, testing had no measurable impact on minority hiring, and productivity gains were uniformly large among minorities and non-minorities. We show formally that these results imply that employers were effectively statistically discriminating prior to the introduction of testing -- that is, their screening practices already accounted for expected productivity differences between applicant groups. Consequently, testing improved selection of both minority and non-minority applicants, but did not alter the racial composition of hiring"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by David H. Autor
Do employment protections redu
Do employment protections reduce productivity?
Do employment protections redu
Do employment protections reduce productivity? evidence from U.S. states
Do temporary help jobs improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers?
Do temporary jobs help improve
Do temporary jobs help improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers?
Outsourcing at will
Rising wage inequality