Unmeasured investment and the puzzling U.S. boom in the 1990
Unmeasured investment and the puzzling U.S. boom in the 1990s
12 min read
Rate this book:
About This Book
The basic neoclassical growth model accounts well for the postwar cyclical behavior of the U.S. economy prior to the 1990s, provided that variations in population growth, depreciation rates, total factor productivity, and taxes are incorporated. For the 1990s, the model predicts a depressed economy, when in fact the U.S. economy boomed. We extend the base model by introducing intangible investment and non-neutral technology change with respect to producing intangible investment goods and find that the 1990s are not puzzling in light of this new theory. There is compelling micro and macro evidence for our extension, and the predictions of the theory are in conformity with U.S. national products, incomes, and capital gains. We use the theory to compare current accounting measures for labor productivity and investment with the corresponding measures for the model economy with intangible investment. Our findings show that standard accounting measures greatly understate the boom in productivity and investment.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Ellen R. McGrattan
Average debt and equity return
Average debt and equity returns
Capital taxation during the U.
Capital taxation during the U.S. Great Depression
Comment on Gali and Rabanal's
Comment on Gali and Rabanal's "technology shocks and aggregate fluctuations; how well does the RBC model fit postwar U.S. data?"
Comment on Mendoza and Tesar's
Comment on Mendoza and Tesar's "why hasn't tax competition triggered a race to the bottom? Some quantitative lessons from the EU"
Does neoclassical theory accou
Does neoclassical theory account for the effects of big fiscal shocks?
Is the stock market overvalued
Is the stock market overvalued?