Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court
1.1 hrs read
Rate this book:
About This Book
"If a majority of the justices of the Supreme Court believes that a law violates the Constitution, it does not necessarily follow that the Court should rule that the law is unconstitutional. In cases in which it is argued that a law violates the Constitution, the Supreme Court must decide which of two importantly different questions it should address: (1) Is the challenged law unconstitutional? (2) Is the lawmakers' judgment that the challenged law is constitutional a reasonable judgment?"--Provided by publisher.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Michael J. Perry
Constitution, the courts, and
Constitution, the courts, and the question of minimalism
Coop: A Year of Poultry, Pigs,
Coop: A Year of Poultry, Pigs, and Parenting
Critique and construction
Global Political Morality
Human Rights In The Constitutional Law Of The United States
Interrogating the Morality of
Interrogating the Morality of Human Rights