How widespread were private investment and regulatory reform
How widespread were private investment and regulatory reform in infrastructure utilities during the 1990s?
Rate this book:
About This Book
"This note provides a snapshot as of 2004 of the share of countries with an independent regulatory agency and with at least some private sector financing of its sectoral investment needs for electricity, water and sanitation, and telecommunications. Among other things, they show that: For respectively, electricity, water and sanitation, and telecommunications, 51 percent, 21 percent, and 66 percent of the developing countries in the sample have an independent regulator, that is, an agency separate from a ministry and from the operator. For respectively, electricity generation, electricity distribution, water and sanitation, and telecommunications, 47 percent, 36 percent, 35 percent, and 59 percent of the developing countries in the sample have at least some private sector financing. The shares of both agencies and private sector involvement tend to increase with income levels. Latin and Central America and Eastern Europe are outliers among regions as almost systematically they have among the highest shares for both indicators across sectors (except water). "--World Bank web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Antonio Estache
(Un)bundling infrastructure pr
(Un)bundling infrastructure procurement
Accounting for poverty in infrastructure reform
Are returns to private infrast
Are returns to private infrastructure in developing countries consistent with risks since the Asian crisis?
Auctions with endogenous parti
Auctions with endogenous participation and quality thresholds
Bidders' entry and auctioneer'
Bidders' entry and auctioneer's rejection
Concession contract renegotiat
Concession contract renegotiations