Did growth become less pro-poor in the 1990s ?
Did growth become less pro-poor in the 1990s ?
Rate this book:
About This Book
"The author analyzes the stability of the empirical relationship between growth and changes in inequality over time. He concludes that while during the 1970s and 1980s the growth process was not accompanied by increases in inequality, during the 1990s a positive and significant correlation appears in the data. For this decade, he estimates that a 1 percent growth rate would be associated with an increase in the gini coefficient of between .3 to .5 percent. This positive correlation is hidden when one estimates the model without allowing for changes in the relationship over the different decades. The finding is robust to a number of departures from the basic specification including: (1) the use of alternative specifications to isolate decadal shifts; (2) the use of robust estimation techniques that address the potential influence of outliers; (3) restricting the sample to a balanced panel for the 1980s and 1990s to control for changes in the composition of the sample related to the unbalanced nature of the panel; and (4) considering the possibility of fixed effects in the data. The author also explores the impact of this structural change in the rate of poverty reduction and concludes that it is far from negligible. "--World Bank web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by J. Humberto Lopez
A normal relationship ? povert
A normal relationship ? poverty, growth, and inequality
Does the Investment Climate Matter?
Does the investment climate matter? : microeconomic foundations of growth in Latin America
Domestic, Foreign or Common Sh
Domestic, Foreign or Common Shocks?
Estimating the value of travel
Estimating the value of travel time in San Sebastian (Spain)
Getting real about inequality