Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital
Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital
Rate this book:
About This Book
"When doing growth accounting, should we use ex post or ex ante measures of user costs to calculate the contribution of capital? The answer, based on a simple model of temporary equilibrium, is that ex post is better in theory. In practice researchers usually calculate ex post user costs by assuming that the rate of return is equalised across assets. But this is only true if expectations are correct. A numerical example shows that either ex ante or ex post can be closer to the true measure, depending on the parameters. I propose a hybrid method that makes use of elements of both approaches. I test this and the other methods using data for 31 UK industries"--London School of Economics web site.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Nicholas Oulton
A statistical framework for th
A statistical framework for the analysis of productivity and sustainable development
Aggregate investment and Tobin
Aggregate investment and Tobin's Q
Chain indices of the cost of l
Chain indices of the cost of living and the path-dependence problem
Competition and the dispersion
Competition and the dispersion of labour productivity amongst UK companies
Depreciation, obsolescence and
Depreciation, obsolescence and the role of capital in growth accounting
Did raw material price rises c
Did raw material price rises cause the productivity slowdown?