A Comparative Analysis of Cicero and Aquinas
48 min read
Rate this book:
About This Book
"In A Comparative Analysis of Cicero and Aquinas, Charles P. Nemeth investigates how, despite their differences, these two figures may be the most compatible brothers in ideas ever conceived in the theory of natural law. Looking to find common threads that run between the philosophies of these two great thinkers of the Classical and Medieval periods, this book aims to determine whether or not there exists a common ground whereby ethical debates and dilemmas can be evaluated. Does comparison between Cicero and Aquinas offer a new pathway for moral measure, based on defined and developed principles? Do they deliver certain moral and ethical principles for human life to which each agree? Instead of a polemical diatribe, comparison between Cicero and Aquinas may edify a method of compromise and afford a more or less restrictive series of judgements about ethical quandaries."--Bloomsbury Publishing.
Buy This Book
As an Amazon Associate and Bookshop.org affiliate, BookOrb earns from qualifying purchases.
Write a Review
Sign in to write a review.
More by Charles P. Nemeth
Christ, Crime, and Moral Judgm
Christ, Crime, and Moral Judgment
Finding Happiness in a Complex
Finding Happiness in a Complex World
Forensic Law Casebook
Forensic Law Casebook
Living in Happiness in a Compl
Living in Happiness in a Complex World
Natural Law Jurisprudence in U. S. Supreme Court Cases since Roe V. Wade
Private Security and the Investigative Process, Fourth Edition